Unofficial archive. This is a read-only, community-run archive of the Apple Support Community. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by Apple Inc.

Reduced memory with Golden Gate

I have a MacBook Air M1 (2020). After upgrading to Golden Gate, I noticed right away that I have a lot less memory available. Plus the available memory reduces like a countdown clock. Although it periodically goes back to the original (reduced memory) Looked up if this is a known issue, and saw it has to do with AI. Turned off all of AI, per these instructions. Turn off Apple Intelligence in macOS 27 - Apple Community. Restarted the machine. There's no change. A lot less memory available, and it quickly reduces even more, periodically going back to more memory, then reducing again. What can I do about this? Should I go back to the latest version or OS 26?


4 replies

I presume that by ‘memory’ you mean storage. Memory is sometimes called RAM (Apple doesn’t use that term anymore because the memory is now ‘universal’ meaning shared across CPU and GPU).


You should aim to have 15-20% of your total internal storage as free space (~30-40 GB as an absolute minimum). If you do not have enough free space on your Mac’s internal storage, then here are some steps to take to safely free up space:

Free up storage space on Mac - Apple Support

Optimize storage space on your Mac - Apple Support

How to free up ‘System Data’ and other st… - Apple Community

 

"System Data" comprises your data, but they are typically hidden files that Spotlight cannot assign to a specific category like Documents or Applications. Examples include Outlook attachments, iOS updates, Cloud storage caches, etc. Starting with macOS 27 Golden Gate, System Data also includes what macOS used to call ‘purgeable’ storage – system caches, Time Machine snapshots and some other data, though the user had no control over the purging. Trying to manually clean out hidden files in System Data is likely to cause more problems than it solves, macOS hides those files for a good reason. Follow the steps in the linked articles above. 

 

On macOS 27, separate ‘purgeable’ space is no longer reported, and instead those data are now considered as used space. They are also now included in System Data, accounting for the apparent increase you (and others) have noticed. You didn't lose space, macOS just categorizes things differently now than on Tahoe.



More detail on this change in this User Tip:

System Data and Free Space Changes in Gol… - Apple Community

 

The best advice is to just ignore the System Data category. ‘System Data’ is merely a catch-all category for files that Spotlight cannot assign to specific categories like Applications, Documents, Photos, etc. In fact, what is now shown as System Data used to be reported as ‘Other’, Apple changed the label in macOS 12 Monterey. System Data probably sounds better, but Other was closer to reality.


REgarding your comment about Apple Intelligence, the user tip that you link has a somewhat misleading title, Apple phrases it more accurately in their support article:

 

Turn off and restrict access to Apple Intelligence features on Mac

 

As Apple states, you can turn off and/or restrict access to some features of Apple Intelligence, but you cannot turn off Apple Intelligence altogether.

 

Apple Intelligence features can be restricted in a more comprehensive way by using a declarative configuration, but that requires device enrollment (i.e., management of the Mac with MDM) and that is beyond the typical processes with which most users are familiar. However, there is a script called Remove Mac AI that is available to execute those functions as a local Profile via a terminal command, if you are comfortable using it. At least one long-time member here has done so without issue. Use it at your own risk, but that process will remove the space used by Apple Intelligence, ~33 GB on my Mac.


Can you provide some screenshots?


I'm concerned that you're talking about "memory" when you may really mean "storage".


The operating system manages memory very well. You usually don't need to worry about that. Storage is a different matter altogether.

As has been pointed out, I have used the wrong terminology. This is about reduced storage, not reduced memory.

Correct. Sorry, I used the wrong terminology. I was referring to reduced storage.