Archive. This is an archive of the Apple Support Community. Discussions are being restored and soon you will be able to read and post here again.

DDM: iOS 27 update with 90-day deferral and satisfied target OS

I'm trying to better understand how Apple's Declarative Device Management (DDM) software update declarations interact with software update deferrals.


Configuration

Our managed iOS devices receive:

Software Update Settings

  • Automatic Download = Always On
  • Automatic Install = Always On
  • CombinedPeriodInDays = 90

Software Update Enforcement

  • Target OS Version = 26.2
  • Target Date Time = August 2026 (already passed)


What I expected

My understanding was:

  1. Once a device reached 26.2, the enforcement declaration would be satisfied.
  2. New releases (for example iOS 27) would remain hidden until the 90-day deferral period expired.
  3. Devices would therefore remain on some version of iOS 26 until iOS 27 became visible after the deferral period.


What I'm seeing

Two devices with apparently identical configuration:

Device A

  • Running iOS 26.6.2
  • Build 23G90
  • Software Update Settings declaration reports successful
  • Software Update Enforcement declaration reports compliant because current version exceeds target 26.2

Device B

  • Running iOS 27.0
  • Build 24A437
  • Same update settings declaration
  • Same enforcement declaration
  • Same target version (26.2)
  • Same 90-day deferral policy reports successful

Additional observations

  • The device that is now on iOS 27 was already enrolled and managed before iOS 27 was released.
  • The device did not recently enrol or restore from backup.
  • The target version has not been changed to iOS 27.
  • The deferral profile reports successfully applied on both devices.
  • The enforcement profile reports as expected because both devices are already above the required target version of 26.2.

Question

When a device has:

  • CombinedPeriodInDays = 90
  • TargetOSVersion = 26.2 (already satisfied)

should iOS 27 remain unavailable until the 90-day deferral expires?

Or is there a scenario where a device can legitimately move to iOS 27 even though the 90-day update deferral declaration is successfully applied?

I'm specifically trying to understand whether this is expected DDM behaviour, a declaration-merging issue, or something else in Apple's update evaluation logic.

0 replies

There are no replies.